|
|
City Council |
|||
|
Agenda Request |
||||
|
Agenda Of: |
12-16-08 |
Agenda Request No: |
IV-C |
|
|
Initiated By: |
Aaron Dobbs, Assistant City Attorney |
Responsible Department: |
City Attorney |
|
|
Presented By: |
Aaron Dobbs, Assistant City Attorney |
Department Head: |
Joe Morris, City Attorney |
|
|
|
|
Additional Department. Head (s): |
Sabine Somers-Kuenzel, Director of Planning |
|
|
Subject / Proceeding: |
Second
Consideration of Ordinance No. 1723, Amending Section 2-167 of the Sugar Land
Development Code relating to Mixed Use Conservation District (MUC) Regulations
|
|||
|
Exhibits: |
Ordinance No. 1723 |
|||
|
Clearances |
Approval |
|||
|
Legal: |
Aaron Dobbs, Assistant City attorney |
Executive Director: |
N/A |
|
|
Purchasing: |
N/A |
Asst. City Manager: |
N/A |
|
|
Budget: |
N/A |
City Manager: |
Allen Bogard |
|
|
Budget |
||||
|
Expenditure Required: $ |
N/A |
|||
|
Amount Budgeted/Reallocation: $ |
N/A |
|||
|
Additional Appropriation: $ |
N/A |
|||
|
Recommended Action |
||||
|
Adopt Ordinance No. 1723 Amending Mixed Use Conservation District (MUC) Regulations |
||||
|
Executive Summary |
||||
|
Enacted on October 2,
2007, Ordinance No. 1645 amended the regulations and approval process for new
buildings and building additions within the Mixed Use Conservation District (MUC).
The new approval process provides for staff approval of buildings and
additions meeting the regulations under Sec. 2-167(a), (b), (c), and (d) of
the Sugar Land Development Code. The
new process also allows the Planning and Zoning Commission to approve the
building or addition through a Site Development Permit if the building or
addition does not comply with a regulation under Subsections (b), (c), and
(d), but is still compatible with the existing character of the
district. However, the Planning and
Zoning Commission may not grant a Site Development Permit if a proposed
building or addition does not comply with a regulation under Subsection
(a). One of the
regulations, Subsection (a)(8) the maximum floor
area of principal buildings (1,500 square feet if south of Guenther; 2,000
square feet if north of Guenther) was
intended to be included under Subsection (b), and thus the Planning and
Zoning Commission could grant a Site Development Permit for a building or
addition that exceeds the maximum floor area regulation. However, when
Ordinance No. 1645 was prepared for Council adoption, the ordinance inadvertently
included the floor area regulation with the regulations under Subsection (a),
and as such, the ordinance does not currently allow the Planning and Zoning
Commission to grant a Permit for a building or addition that varies from this
regulation. Research conducted by the
Planning Department has since confirmed that the intent for the Site
Development Permit process included Planning and Zoning Commission approval
of permits allowing for square footage that exceeds district standards. Accordingly,
Ordinance No. 1723 amends the MUC District regulations by removing the maximum
square footage regulation from Sec. 2-167(a) of the Development Code, and
properly places it with other regulations under Sec. 2-167(b). This amendment will allow for buildings and
additions that would not meet the staff-approvable square footage regulation
to be considered through the Site Development Permit process as originally
intended. Since this
ordinance involves a correction to a drafting error and not a substantive planning
issue, the Planning Department has asked the City Attorneys Office to
present this matter. |
||||
|
Exhibits |
||||
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SUGAR LAND,
TEXAS, AMENDING SECTION 2-167 OF THE SUGAR LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE RELATING TO
MIXED USE CONSERVATION DISTRICT (MUC) REGULATIONS.
BE IT ORDAINED BY
THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF SUGAR LAND, TEXAS:
Sec. 1. That Sec. 2-167 of the Sugar Land Development Code is amended by amending Subsections (a) and (b) and adding Subsection (e) to read as follows:
(a) The following regulations apply in the Mixed Use Conservation District:
(1) Minimum Lot Area 6,600 square feet;
(2) Maximum Lot Coverage 40 percent;
(3) Maximum Height of Structures:
(A) North of Guenther 27 feet from finished grade.
(B) South of Guenther:
(i) 1 ½ stories but not more than 20 feet from finished grade to peak of roof if within 75 feet of the front lot line;
(ii) 27 feet from the finished grade if beyond 75 feet of the front lot line;
(4) Yards:
(A) Front 20 feet;
(B) Rear Minimum of 25 feet;
(C) Side: Residential Use 10 percent of lot width, but not less than five feet;
(D) Side: Nonresidential Use Minimum of 10 feet;
(E) Street Side Minimum of 15 feet;
(5) Minimum Lot Width:
(A) Corner Lots 75 feet;
(B) All Other Lots 60 feet;
(6) Minimum Lot Depth 125 feet;
(7) Minimum Parking Lot Setbacks:
(A) Front and Street Side Lot Lines 15 feet;
(B) Rear and Side Lot Lines Six feet;
(8) Minimum of 30 percent of Lot not covered by buildings, pavement or gravel;
(9) No attached garages are permitted.
(b) The following regulations apply to principal buildings in the Mixed Use Conservation District:
(1) Must be constructed on the front of the lot;
(2) Front porch required:
(A) Minimum of 10 percent of width of front facade of the building;
(B) If Covered 20 foot front yard;
(C) If Not Covered May extend up to five feet into required front yard;
(3) Gable roof required on all sides of the building:
(A) Minimum Overhang One foot;
(B) Maximum Overhang Two feet;
(4) Partial hip roof required on all buildings located at 322 Brooks St. and south;
(5) Maximum Floor Area of Principal Building:
(A) If South of Guenther 1,500 square feet;
(B) If North of Guenther 2,000 square feet.
(e) In this section, a partial hip roof means a roof where one-quarter to one-half of the roof, as measured vertically from the top of the roof to the base of the roof, slopes down to the front facade of the building.
Section 2. That the provisions of this ordinance are severable and the invalidity of any part of this ordinance will not affect the validity of the remainder of the ordinance.
APPROVED on first consideration on ____________________________.
ADOPTED on second consideration on ___________________________.
__________________________
James A. Thompson, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________
Glenda Gundermann, City Secretary
Reviewed for Legal Compliance:
![]()