|
|
City Council |
|||
|
Agenda Request |
||||
|
Agenda Of: |
February 06, 2007 |
Agenda Request No: |
IV B |
|
|
Initiated By: |
dale rudick, Intergovernmental realtions director |
Responsible Department: |
intergovernmental relations |
|
|
Presented By: |
dale rudick, intergovernmental realtions director |
Department Head: |
dale rudick, intergovernmental relations director |
|
|
|
|
Additional Department. Head (s): |
n/a |
|
|
Subject / Proceeding: |
|
|||
|
Exhibits: |
resolution NO. 07-03 |
|||
|
Clearances |
Approval |
|||
|
Legal: |
Joe Morris, city attorney |
Executive Director: |
joseph esch business & intergovernmental relzations. |
|
|
Purchasing: |
N/A |
Asst. City Manager: |
N/A |
|
|
Budget: |
N/A |
City Manager: |
Allen Bogard |
|
|
Budget |
||||
|
Expenditure Required: $ |
n/a |
|||
|
Amount Budgeted/Reallocation: $ |
n/a |
|||
|
Additional Appropriation: $ |
n/a |
|||
|
Recommended Action |
||||
|
Consideration and Action on Resolution No. 07-03 and provide additional direction, if necessary. |
||||
|
Executive Summary |
|
In 2005, the Mobility Planning Committee issued a call for projects for a future mobility bond issue. As a part of that call for projects it was required of each agency to prioritize their submitted projects. The City’s projects submitted in prioritized order and the amount of construction funding requested from the County were as follows: 1) University
Boulevard ( 2) 3) Dairy Ashford/Spur 41 Widening (Julie Rivers to US 59); $ 830,000 4) Spine
Road (Commonwealth to 5) Total $21,290,400 The County began formulating a process and establishing a
list of criteria in which the projects were to be ranked. Based on this county established criteria,
the projects were ranked and distributed to the Mobility Planning Committee
on December 4, 2006. All five of Commissioners Court held two workshops in January of 2007 where they prioritized the solely sponsored county projects located within the unincorporated county and pared down their list of more than $250 million to approximately $104 million. Each of the cities had already prioritized their projects At the January 23, 2007 Council workshop, staff presented
an update of the process that has been ongoing by both the The City recognizes the importance of a County mobility
bond referendum to help remedy some of the growing traffic concerns, however,
the City believes residents of cities who also pay County taxes should
receive their fair share of projects.
In the spirit of cooperation and to help facilitate this process to
move forward, the attached resolution reprioritizes the City’s original five
submitted projects, reduces the number of submitted projects to four, and
clarifies the assumptions of the City’s request. The
project that was removed from the list was The amount of County funds requested on two of the projects also needs further description: University Boulevard: The request for funding is primarily for
two sections of regionally significant four-lane road that is extraneous to
any master planned development. The
limits of these two sections are 1) The northernmost segment near US 90A includes a proportionate share to be paid by the developer along 90A for a future traffic signal. The landowner also dedicated 100% of the necessary University right-of-way which includes right-of-way for an exclusive right turn lane approaching US 90A. The City is also currently working with the two master
planned communities to help expedite the completion of four lanes of
University within their developments concurrent with the proposed County/City
funded sections. This will provide for the completion of four lanes of road
for University between The City originally requested an additional $12.99 million for this project. However, the City is willing to modify the scope of the project and increase our financial commitment, thus lowering the request for County participation to $11.2 million provided that the County honors its $3.25 million executed agreement from the 2000 bond referendum. The original submittal included a storm sewer upsizing within Telfair to allow for the City to efficiently expand the road to accommodate lanes five and six sometime in the future. However, these funds for the storm sewer upsizing are appropriated in the City’s current CIP and will cover the expense that is to be repaid to the developer. The City’s original request for This reprioritization of the projects along with the list of assumptions and conditions reduces the City’s request for County bonds from $21,290,400 to $15,670,000. This has been a very dynamic process and staff will update Council on the next scheduled meeting of the Mobility Planning Committee of February 5, 2007. |
|
Exhibits |
RESOLUTION NO. 07-03
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
WHEREAS, at the request of the Fort Bend County Mobility Committee, Fort Bend County is finalizing a list of projects for a potential future mobility bond issue and, as in the past, the City wants to continue to work with the County in maximizing the resources of all agencies working together to help ensure all residents of Fort Bend secure the best possible product at the lowest possible cost; and
WHEREAS, the Commissioners Court of Fort Bend has already selected road projects that are located in the unincorporated (non-city) portions of the County and will be wholly funded by the proposed mobility bonds while a disproportionate share of remaining mobility funds may be utilized within the incorporated municipalities provided the cities provide a local match; and
WHEREAS, it is important that elected leaders of the County remember that residents within the geographical boundaries of cities are also residents of the County and the residents of cities pay both City and County taxes; and
WHEREAS, the County should coordinate and cooperate with municipalities to ensure County residents residing within the cities receive their fair share of support and services for the County taxes they pay because the roadway projects within the cities will enhance mobility within the most congested and densely populated portions of the County; and
WHEREAS, the cities are the home to the major employment, residential, and educational centers of the County and congestion relief is vital to maintaining and continuing high quality economic development; and
WHEREAS, the cities provide nearly half of the taxable value for the county with the City of Sugar Land providing nearly 25% of the taxable value for the County; and
WHEREAS, the City of Sugar Land had originally submitted five projects in response to the Fort Bend County Mobility Committee’s call for new projects and in the interest of helping the County move forward on a future bond issuance to be approved by the voters, the City has reduced the number of prioritized projects to four; and
WHEREAS, each of those four projects is regionally significant and is located on a roadway that is classified as an arterial on the approved City of Sugar Land Thoroughfare Plan and all four projects are located on roadways identified on both the Fort Bend County Mobility Plan and the Houston-Galveston Area Council’s Regional Transportation Plan where each of these project submittals is a segment of a major corridor that traverses and impacts two or more cities within Fort Bend County; and
WHEREAS, each of these submitted projects is consistent with the City’s approved Fiscal Year 2007–2011 Capital Improvement Program; NOW, THEREFORE,
OF THE CITY OF
Section 1. That it submits the following updated prioritized list of projects to the Fort Bend County Mobility Committee as follows:
1) University
Boulevard:
2)
3) Dairy
4)
Section 2. That the project amounts requested of the County by the City for the next bond issue for the aforementioned projects be as follows:
1) University Boulevard: $11.2 million provided that the $3.25 million appropriated from the 2000 bonds and with a related County/City agreement remain in tact for the purposes of the construction of the said project.
2)
3) Dairy Ashford Expansion: $830,000
4)
Section 3. That the City will consider
support for a future mobility bond election provided that
APPROVED on _______________________________, 2007.
_________________________
David G. Wallace, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________
Glenda Gundermann, City Secretary
Reviewed for Legal Compliance:
![]()