City Council

Agenda Request

Agenda Of:

1/23/07

Agenda Request No:

V C

Initiated By:

douglas p. schomburg, aicp

asst. planning director

Responsible Department:

planning

Presented By:

douglas p. schomburg, aicp

asst. planning director

Department Head:

sabine somers-kuenzel, aicp

director of planning

 

 

Additional Department. Head (s):

n/a

Subject / Proceeding:

development code amendment to chapter two (zoning), article II, to allow metal stampings manufacturing in the restricted industrial (m-1) district

workshop

Exhibits:

supplemental information, information from field investigation / tour photos

Clearances

Approval

Legal:

n/a

Executive Director:

jim callaway

community development

Purchasing:

n/a

Asst. City Manager:

n/a

Budget:

n/a

City Manager:

Allen Bogard

Budget

Expenditure Required:  $

n/a

Amount Budgeted/Reallocation:  $

n/a

Additional Appropriation:  $

n/a

Recommended Action

Receive workshop presentation and provide feedback.

Executive Summary

This workshop is being held to give Council an overview of a proposed City-initiated amendment to Chapter Two (Zoning), Article II of the Development Code.  The amendment is to allow SIC Code Major Group 45 (Fabricated Metal Products) No. 3469  (Metal Stampings) manufacturing within the Restricted Industrial (M-1) District under specific conditions.  In 2006, the Tramontina USA corporation, (cookware manufacturing), which has their US corporate headquarters and warehousing / distribution centers located in Sugar Land, requested that the City examine current zoning codes regarding cookware manufacturing.  The company is interested in locating a new metal stamping and pressing facility for the production of pots, pans, and related cookware within the Sugar Land Business Park, which is zoned M-1.  Currently, the only district that allows SIC Code No. 3469 uses is the General Industrial (M-2) District, which allows “heavy industrial” type uses.  The City of Sugar Land’s Comprehensive Plan states that additional heavy industrial uses would not be supported as a general rule.

 

The process of metal stamping and pressing is more typical of “light industrial” uses and does not involve metal smelting / furnaces.  The base material that is used in cookware manufacturing from companies such as Tramontina USA is rolled aluminum.  In addition, the company generally uses pre-cut flat aluminum circles in their pot / pan shaping, which avoids large-scale cutting operations.  In October of 2006, City staff was invited to tour a cookware manufacturing facility in Manitowoc, Wisconsin, operated by Tramontina USA.  Members of Planning and Economic Development participated in the tour and conducted a field investigation as to the operation and processes involved.  Additional information regarding the tour is contained within this report.

 

This item was reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission in workshop format in November of 2006, and a Public Hearing was held on December 12, 2006 where Tramontina-USA spoke in favor of the amendment.  These meetings resulted in detailed feedback and discussion from the Commission, and further staff research and analysis. Following that additional work, the Commission gave a unanimous recommendation for approval at the January 9, 2007 meeting.  The Commission supported specific conditions recommended by staff on this type of use (performance zoning) to mitigate any land use concerns including a 500’ buffer from residential districts and a maximum noise limit of 70 decibels.  Detailed information is attached for reference.

 

Regina Morales, Director of Economic Development  rmorales@sugarlandtx.gov

File No. 7088

Exhibits

 

 

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:

 

Planning and Zoning Commission Actions:

 

The Planning and Zoning Commission provided input on this item during workshop format on November 14, 2006.  Key aspects discussed were:

  • Overview of uses, including business operations questions regarding stamping and finishing
  • Comparison examples of other cities zoning requirements and the proposed use
  • Type of buffer that might be appropriate between residential districts and proposed use
  • Request for an example of the type of exterior look (venting / air stacks) that a modern cookware-related metal stamping and finishing plant
  • Research into any adverse effects on finishing (painting and non-stick type coatings)
  • SIC Code List under 3469

 

Following additional staff research, a Public Hearing was held on December 12, 2006 on the proposed amendment, and the Planning Department presented updated information regarding prior questions.  That included a two-fold approach to mitigation of impacts with a buffer distance and noise level standards to more effectively address possible issues.  The Commission discussed the possibility of whether the 500’ buffer could apply from residential uses (in addition to residential zoning district boundaries) to cover ETJ areas and areas outside the City jurisdiction.  The Commission also indicated that the mitigation measures proposed should allow the full list of uses under SIC Code No. 3469 to be considered without narrowing the list.  Due to the question posed at the Public Hearing meeting, staff requested that the Commission make a recommendation on the following policy question regarding measurement of the 500’ buffer area:

 

·        Measure 500’ from properties used for “Residential Uses”

Or

·        Measure 500’ from the boundary of a “Residential Zoning District”

 

Measurements from residential zoning district boundaries contain the buffer area within the corporate limits, while 500’ from residential uses would limit M-1 uses from both residential properties within the ETJ as well as other city jurisdictions.  Following additional discussion, the Commission recommended that the measurement use the “Residential District” criteria based on the corporate limits.  Proposed ordinance language will allow metal stamping within the M-1 district with the conditions of 500’ buffer distance from residential district boundaries and a decibel level at the site property line of not greater than 70 decibels.  If proposed closer than 500’ to a residential district, a CUP would be required to allow for further examination of the proposal and any mitigation measures that might be appropriate.

 

 

ANALYSIS INFORMATION:

 

 

Performance Zoning Measures:

M-1 regulations that limit environmental impacts that a business might generate:

Chapter Two, Art. II, Sec. 2-151 (f)   Environmental.

(1)      No use may generate any ground-transmitted vibration in excess of one-tenth (.10) inch per second measured at the Lot Line, or in excess of two-hundredths (.02) inch per second measured at any residential Lot Line. These values may be multiplied by two for impact vibrations, i.e. discrete vibration pulsations not exceeding one second in duration and having a pause of at least one second between pulses.

(2)      Heat from furnaces, processing equipment, or other devices must be contained so that the temperature of air or materials is raised no more than five degrees Fahrenheit as measured at all Lot Lines.

(3)      Odors or fumes created by industrial processes must be contained so that no odors may be sensed at the Lot Line which exceeds the lowest amount set forth in Table III (Odor Thresholds) of Chapter 5, "Physiological Effects," of Air Pollution Abatement Manual of the Manufacturing Chemists Association (latest edition). For compounds not described in Table III, odor thresholds may be established by methods indicated in Chapter 5 of the manual

The environmental conditions previously stated relating to heat, fumes, odors, and vibration are applicable to any business operating in the M-1 District.  Protection from noise is not covered within the environmental provisions within the Development Code and is discussed further in the next section of the report.

 

Comparison of Zoning Codes for Neighboring Cities:

As requested by the Commission, staff examined two adjacent cities with zoning ordinance requirements.  Staff examined the zoning ordinances of the City of Missouri City and the City of Stafford, and found that SIC Code 3469 uses are allowed in the industrial zones similar to the M-1 district.  Both codes have performance standards that have similarities to the environmental requirements within Chapter Two, Article II of the Development Code.  However, both Missouri City and Stafford have the additional safeguard of maximum decibel levels for industrial districts.  These codes are detailed as follows:

 

City of Missouri City- The type of uses described in SIC Code No. 3469 are allowed within the industrial business park zone in Missouri City and the standard industrial zone.  The zoning ordinance contains specific performance zoning measures that require any business that operates to ensure that there is no negative impact with regard to smoke, dust, ash, heat, glare, vibration at the property lines of the business.  Noise standards require that in no case can noise levels exceed 70 decibels at any point along the property lines of the industrial business.  No outdoor display of materials or merchandise is allowed, and setbacks of at least 30 feet are required from the property lines.

 

City of Stafford-  Although zoning was not in place until 1997, the City of Stafford presently has specific requirements including performance standards for industrial uses within the corporate limits.  The uses under SIC Code No. 3469 are allowed within the commercial and technology district (similar to  Missouri City industrial business park).  Items such as vibration, smoke, heat, glare and noise are addressed in the performance standards.  Specific standards require noise levels not to exceed 62 decibels at any point along the property lines of the industrial business.

 

Additional Examination of Buffer and Noise Mitigation:

Based on discussions and feedback at the Commission meetings and additional staff research, we are suggesting that a two-pronged approach be used to ensure mitigation of any impacts and to provide appropriate safeguards to the public in order to site a metal stamping facility in M-1.  This approach is as follows and is further detailed in the next sections:

 

·        Maximum noise level at property line of a site with proposed use not greater than 70 Decibels

and

·        Buffer distance of 500’ from facility where use occurs to nearest residential zoning district

 

 

Noise Level-

Staff has further examined both the issue of a buffering distance as well as the subject of noise mitigation.  One of the key reasons for a buffer distance is to minimize noise impacts to residential districts.   However, our research has indicated that there needs to be a focus on specific noise level maximums rather than distance only as a buffer.  One of the ways that the M-1 District provides protection to neighboring zoning districts and adjacent properties is that “All business activities must be conducted within a fully enclosed building” (Ch. Two, Art. II, Sec. 2-151 (e).  This serves to minimize noise impacts to a large extent.  The current noise requirements for the City are primarily focused on noise impacting residential areas from radio, stereo, speaker systems, and outdoor playground facilities (Code of Ordinances, Ch. III, Art. VI) rather than industrial uses.  It is helpful to examine standard noise measurement comparisons to better understand noise levels.  The following information is taken from The Practice of Local Government Planning (2000) (p. 105) and is based on a decibel scale weighted to the hearing range of the human ear.

 

Sound Environment:

 (Decibels)

Threshold of Hearing

                            0

Broadcast studio interior

                          10

Quiet house interior

                          20

Quiet office interior

                          30

Quiet rural area

                          40

Quiet suburban area

                          50

Office interior

                          60

Human voice at 10 feet

                          70

Passing car at 10 feet

                          80

Passing bus or truck at 10 feet

                          90

Passing subway train at 10 feet

                        100

Nightclub with band playing

                        110

Threshold of pain

                        120

 

 

As the Planning Department examined performance zoning research for noise mitigation, 70 decibels was a common reference to the maximum noise allowed adjacent to residential areas.  The City of Missouri City performance standard maximum for the industrial business park district is not to exceed 70 decibels at the property line of an industrial site.  The City of Stafford performance standard for the industrial and technology district is not to exceed 62 decibels at the property line of the industrial site.  Currently the City of Sugar Land does not have performance standards for noise in the M-1 or M-2 Districts other than indirect requirements for vibration maximums.  The staff work on this amendment has revealed that further examination of future noise-related performance standards for the industrial and commercial districts in the City of Sugar Land may be appropriate.  Staff proposes that a noise level maximum of not greater than 70 decibels at the industrial site property line is an appropriate minimum standard for this type of manufacturing use.

 

Buffer Distance-

The 500’ distance plays an important role in the Development Code regulations in Chapter Two, Article II that establishes the “bulk plane” impact requirements from commercial and industrial developments to residential districts.  The requirements are triggered if the proposed building is within 500’ of a residential district.  When the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council examined the issue of a reasonable distance to trigger the bulk plane requirements, 500’ was ultimately determined to be the most appropriate.  This is also the same distance as the minimum length of a residential block of lots in a subdivision.  Distance as a buffering tool is found to be a standard planning principle which is further supported by Planning Advisory Service (PAS) studies by the American Planning Association, and many zoning ordinances throughout the United States.  An example of sound impact in a standard calculation is illustrated below, which references listening distance at standard setback of 25’ vs. 500’ setback (buffer):

 

·        Standard buffer setback for M-1 industrial building from residential district = 25’

·        Noise occurring at distance of 25’ is reduced by approximately 26 decibels at a distance of 500’

 

When applying the 70 decibels previously discussed to the 500’ buffer as proposed, a drop to approximately 44 decibels can be expected at the residential district.  Therefore, a buffer distance of 500’ from an industrial building (conducting metal stamping / finishing) in M-1 to a residential district with the specific sound provision of 70 decibels at the industrial site property line provides additional protection.  Since equipment and business activities are required to be located in a fully enclosed building in M-1, no decibels are anticipated to reach 70 at the property line. However, the combination of buffering and maximum noise standards provide a strong safeguard for the proposed use and are in line with standards used by adjacent municipalities.

 

Type of Metal Stamping Uses:

Standard Industrial Classification Manual: SIC Code No. 3469 Metal Stampings, Not Elsewhere Classified

“Establishments primarily engaged in manufacturing metal stampings and spun products, not elsewhere classified, including porcelain enameled products.  Products of this industry include household appliance housings and parts; cooking and kitchen utensils, and other non-automotive stampings.”

 

Appliance parts, porcelain enameled

Ashcans, stamped and pressed metal

Ashtrays, stamped metal

Automobile license tags, stamped metal

Bottle openers, stamped metal

Capacitor and condenser cans and cases, stamped metal

Cash and stamp boxes:  stamped metal

Chassis, radio and TV: stamped metal

Cookers, pressure:  stamped metal

Cooking ware, porcelain enameled

Electronic enclosures:  stamped or pressed

Fins, tube:  stamped metal

Floor tile:  stamped metal

Furniture components, porcelain enameled

Garbage cans:  stamped and pressed metal

Helmets, steel

Honeycombed metal

Household utensils:  stamped and pressed metal

Housings for business machines:  stamped metal

Ice cream dippers

Ironer parts:  porcelain enameled

Kitchen utensils: porcelain

Kitchen utensils: stamped and pressed metal

Lunch boxes, stamped metal

Machine parts, stamped and pressed metal

Mailboxes, except collection boxes

Pails, stamped and pressed metal:  except tinned and shipping type

Pans, stamped and pressed metal:  except tinned

Patterns on metal

Perforated metal, stamped

Perforating on light metal

Rigidizing metal

Spinning metal, for the trade

Stamping metal ,for the trade

Store fronts, porcelain enameled

Stove parts, porcelain enameled

Table tops, porcelain enameled

Teakettles, except electric:  stamped metal

Toolboxes:  stamped metal

Utensils, metal, except cast:  household, commercial, and hospital

Utensils, porcelain enameled:  household, commercial, and hospital

Wahsing machine parts, porcelain enameled

Wastebaskets, stamped metal

 

Example Rendering of Metal Stamping / Finishing Type Manufacturer:

During the Commission workshop meeting, questions were raised as to the type of appearance that a typical modern metal stamping and finishing plant would have.  The Manitowoc, Wisconsin plant currently operated by Tramontina-USA was constructed in the early 1950’s and was used by previous cookware companies.  As a result, the exterior appearance is not necessarily representative of a 21st century operation.  Tramontina-USA provided a graphic at the December 12, 2006 meeting showing  a rendering of a modern cookware fabrication plant to illustrate exterior features prior to consideration and action of this item. 

 

It is important to note that the City of Sugar Land Development Code has provisions for screening of rooftop equipment and fans under Chapter Three.  This is typically accomplished through parapet screening walls.  Although the M-1 and M-2 Districts do not have City building finish standards, Tramontina has indicated that tilt-wall construction is typical of these types of operations, and would be used in any plant construction.  Tilt-wall construction is typical of the current construction projects within the Sugar Land Business Park.

 

 

Research on Environmental Effects for Metal Finishing:

Staff examined the Texas regulations for this type of SIC Code category.  The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) regulates these types of uses as to operations and any venting.  We have not found that the proposed use would be out of character with the environmental regulations found in the Development Code or the TCEQ.

 

 

POINTS FOR CONSIDERATION:

 

The following items are being recommended for consideration for the proposed use of metal stamping and finishing under SIC Code No. 3469 within the M-1 District:

 

 

·        Mitigation measures proposed should provide safeguards to allow the full range of uses under SIC Code No. 3469 for M-1

·        Minimum distance of at least 500’ from proposed metal stamping / finishing industrial building to nearest residential zoning district.  CUP required if within 500’ of a residential district. 

·        Noise level not greater than 70 Decibels at property line of the metal stamping / finishing site

 

 


Draft ordinance:

 

ORDINANCE NO. ****

 

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SUGAR LAND, TEXAS, AMENDING CHAPTER 2 OF THE SUGAR LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE BY AMENDING THE LAND USE MATRIX TO ADD METAL STAMPINGS AS AN APPROVED USE IN THE RESTRICTED INDUSTRIAL (M-1) ZONING DISTRICTS. 

 

            WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has recommended that the City’s zoning regulations be amended to allow metal stampings as an approved use in a Restricted Industrial (M-1) zoning district; and

 

            WHEREAS, the City Council has held a public hearing on the proposed amendment for which notice was published at least fifteen days prior to the hearing date; NOW, THEREFORE;

 

                        BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF SUGAR LAND, TEXAS:

 

            Section 1.  That the Land Use Matrix, as adopted by paragraph (d) of section 2-55 of the Sugar Land Development Code is amended to show Metal Stampings, Not Elsewhere Classified (SIC No. 3469) as an allowed use in the Restricted Industrial (M-1) zoning districts as shown in attached Exhibit A.  

 

            APPROVED on first consideration on ___________________.

 

            ADOPTED upon second consideration on ________________.

 

                                                                        _________________________

                                                                        David G. Wallace, Mayor

 

ATTEST:

 

___________________________

Glenda Gundermann, City Secretary

 

Reviewed for legal compliance:

 

 

 

 

Attachment:  Exhibit A - Land Use Matrix (Page 2:21)

 

 


 

 

SIC

   

SIC NO.   

PERMITTED AND  CONDITIONALUSES BY  ZONING DISTRICT

ZONING DISTRICTS

   

NOTES

DESCRIPTION   

R-E

R-1R

R-1

R-1Z

R-2

R-3

R-4

B-O

B-1